top of page

Why Most Property Development Feasibilities Are Wrong (And How to Get Them Right)

  • Writer: Ida Bahrami
    Ida Bahrami
  • 2 days ago
  • 4 min read

Every successful development starts with a feasibility.


But here’s the uncomfortable truth: Most property development feasibilities are wrong.


Not because developers aren’t capable—but because the feasibility is often treated as a formality rather than a critical decision-making tool.


Too many projects are based on optimistic assumptions, incomplete data, and unrealistic timelines—only to run into cost blowouts, delays, and reduced profits down the track.


If you want to succeed in development, getting your feasibility right isn’t optional—it’s non-negotiable.


Why Most Property Development Feasibilities Fail


Costs Are Consistently Underestimated


One of the biggest issues in any property development feasibility is failing to account for the full cost of a project.


It’s not just construction—developers often overlook:

  • Site preparation and remediation

  • Infrastructure upgrades (power, sewer, water)

  • Consultant and approval costs

  • Holding costs (interest, rates, land tax)

  • GST and transaction expenses


These “hidden” costs can significantly impact your bottom line and are often the reason projects fall apart.


Revenue Is Overestimated


Many feasibilities rely on best-case sales outcomes.


This includes:

  • Assuming peak market prices

  • Ignoring potential oversupply

  • Overestimating buyer demand


Markets change—and quickly.


A feasibility based on optimistic sales figures creates a false sense of security.


Timeframes Are Unrealistic


Time is one of the most underestimated risks in development.


Feasibilities often assume:

  • Smooth DA approvals

  • Immediate construction commencement

  • No delays


In reality, delays are common—and expensive.


Longer timeframes mean increased holding costs, extended financing, and reduced profit.


Lack of Proper Contingency


Even well-managed projects face unexpected issues.


Yet many developers fail to include a sufficient contingency buffer.


A realistic approach is: 10–15% contingency across both construction and soft costs


Without this, even minor variations can create major financial stress.


Poor Market Understanding


A feasibility is only as strong as the market it’s based on.


Developers who don’t properly assess:

  • Buyer demographics

  • Local demand

  • Comparable sales

  • Competing developments


Often deliver the wrong product.


As industry insights consistently show, misunderstanding the market is a leading cause of development failure


Just because you can build something doesn’t mean it will sell.


How to Get Your Feasibility Right


Take a Conservative Approach


Experienced developers don’t rely on best-case scenarios.


Instead, they:

  • Reduce expected sale prices

  • Increase cost assumptions

  • Allow for longer timeframes


If a project still works under conservative assumptions, it’s far more robust.


Complete Thorough Due Diligence


The best time to identify risk is before you purchase the site.


This includes:

  • Reviewing zoning and planning controls

  • Identifying easements and constraints

  • Checking flood, bushfire, or environmental overlays

  • Confirming service connections


The goal is to eliminate unknowns early.


Use Accurate, Expert Inputs


Relying on rough estimates or generic rates can lead to major errors.


A strong feasibility should be supported by:

  • Quantity Surveyor cost estimates

  • Real, current comparable sales

  • Planning advice based on local controls


Accurate inputs = accurate outcomes.


Treat Feasibility as a Living Document


A feasibility isn’t something you prepare once and forget.


It should be updated throughout the project as:


  • Costs change

  • Designs evolve

  • Market conditions shift


Tracking performance against your feasibility helps you identify issues early and stay in control.


Manage Risk from the Start


The earlier risks are addressed, the more control you have over the outcome.


This may include:

  • Locking in fixed-price construction contracts

  • Finalising design decisions early

  • Structuring projects to manage cash flow

  • Considering pre-sales where appropriate


Feasibility is not just about numbers—it’s about strategy.


How OwnerDeveloper Can Help


At OwnerDeveloper, we specialise in preparing detailed, accurate property development feasibilities that go beyond surface-level assumptions.


We understand that your feasibility is the foundation of your entire project—and getting it wrong can be costly.


  • Comprehensive feasibility modelling

  • Detailed cost identification (including hidden costs)

  • Market-driven revenue analysis

  • Risk and sensitivity testing

  • Ongoing feasibility updates as your project evolves


Whether you’re assessing a potential site or refining an existing project, we help you understand what is truly feasible—not just what looks good on paper.


Because the right feasibility doesn’t just guide your project—it protects your profit.


Final Thoughts


Most development projects don’t fail during construction—

They fail at the feasibility stage.


The developers who consistently succeed are those who:


✔ Take a conservative approach

✔ Understand their market

✔ Identify risks early

✔ Continuously refine their numbers


Because in property development, success isn’t about guessing—it’s about getting the fundamentals right from the beginning.


Frequently Asked Questions


What is a property development feasibility?


A property development feasibility is a financial and strategic assessment used to determine whether a project is viable and profitable.


Why are most feasibilities wrong?


Most are based on optimistic assumptions, underestimated costs, and incomplete data, which leads to inaccurate projections.


What costs are often missed in a feasibility?


Commonly missed costs include holding costs, infrastructure upgrades, consultant fees, GST, and site-related expenses.


How much contingency should I include?


A contingency of around 10–15% is typically recommended to account for unexpected costs.


Should I update my feasibility during the project?


Yes. A feasibility should be treated as a live document and updated as costs, timelines, and market conditions change.


Can OwnerDeveloper help with feasibility studies?


Yes. OwnerDeveloper provides detailed feasibility assessments, helping developers, investors, and homeowners understand project viability and reduce risk before committing.


Collage with business awards, people in formal wear. Text: "From Planning & Approvals... To Real Outcomes." Awards from 2020 to 2023 shown below.


2 Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
Guest
a day ago
Rated 5 out of 5 stars.

Simple, honest, and very relevant. The focus on conservative assumptions and hidden costs really stood out—it’s the kind of stuff people don’t talk about enough.

Like

Guest
a day ago
Rated 5 out of 5 stars.

This was a really eye-opening read. It explains why so many projects go wrong right from the feasibility stage, and it does it in a way that actually makes you reflect on how you approach deals.

Like
_M4_1154_1224x816_2664142.jpg

Get Daily Updates

Sign up for exclusive insights, expert opinions, project showcases, and the latest industry news!

Thanks for submitting!

bottom of page