top of page

🚆 Why Australians Aren’t Buying Into Transit-Oriented Developments — And What We Should Be Building Instead

  • Writer: Danny Ghaebi
    Danny Ghaebi
  • Jan 2
  • 2 min read

Transit-Oriented Developments (TODs) sound like the future: high-density apartments, mixed-use precincts, walkable cities, and thriving hubs around train stations. Politicians love them. Planners promote them. But there’s just one problem.


🏘️ Australians aren’t buying it. Literally.


At OwnerDeveloper, we work on the ground with real homeowners, builders, and investors—and what we’re seeing doesn’t match the headlines.


Here’s the reality check.


🧱 1. The Market Wants Space—Not Slogans

TODs are often designed for singles and couples without kids. But most buyers in the current market? They're families, retirees, and professionals looking for:


  • Privacy

  • Room to grow

  • Driveway and garage access

  • Local parks and community feel


That’s not what most TODs deliver. Compact apartments above noisy retail strips don’t exactly scream “family living.”


💰 2. Affordability Is Still Out of Reach

The theory goes: Build near transport hubs = more affordable housing. The reality?


  • Land near stations is expensive

  • Mixed-use buildings are expensive to build

  • Planning regulations are slow and complex

  • The final product? Often not affordable at all


Without meaningful subsidies or incentives, these projects are priced like luxury housing but marketed as social solutions.


Affordability Is Still Out of Reach

🏢 3. Mixed-Use ≠ Mixed Demand

TODs promise vibrant live-work-play communities. But when commercial tenants can’t survive due to low foot traffic, you’re left with:


  • Empty shops

  • Low community appeal

  • Poor returns


It becomes a feedback loop: buyers don’t want to move in, retailers don’t want to rent, and the development struggles to stay alive.


📋 4. Red Tape + Planning Fatigue

Even when the intent is good, the process is broken.

TOD projects face:


  • Long approval timelines

  • Council pushback

  • Unrealistic design conditions

  • Requirements for public art, open space, sustainability features — all of which add cost and complexity


It’s no wonder many developers walk away before they break ground.


4. Red Tape + Planning Fatigue

🚗 5. Cultural Reality: Cars Still Rule

TODs want to eliminate car reliance. But ask a family in Western Sydney or a downsizer in Newcastle — most aren’t ready to give up their cars.


Australia’s “dream home” is still a detached house with space and a garage. That’s not changing overnight.


✅ So… What Should We Be Building?

At OwnerDeveloper, we believe the future isn’t about forcing people into high-density boxes.


It’s about building smarter, liveable communities that match real demand.


✔️ Low-rise duplexes in suburban growth zones

✔️ Medium-density townhomes with flexibility

✔️ Custom knockdown-rebuilds that retain neighbourhood character

✔️ Clear site supervision and communication, so builders and families stay aligned from day one


We aren’t anti-TOD. We’re anti-one-size-fits-all. Transit-oriented ideas can work — but only when they are driven by market logic, not political slogans.


💬 Final Word

The gap between planning idealism and property market reality is growing. But there’s an opportunity to reset.

If governments want TODs to succeed, they must:


  • Streamline planning

  • Offer real incentives for affordability

  • Build with families in mind

  • Partner with developers who know what real buyers want


Until then, the hype will remain just that—hype.

At OwnerDeveloper, we’ll keep doing what we do best: helping Australians build where, how, and what they actually want to live in.



Final Word

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
_M4_1154_1224x816_2664142.jpg

Get Daily Updates

Sign up for exclusive insights, expert opinions, project showcases, and the latest industry news!

Thanks for submitting!

bottom of page